USFI vs. SCUB

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

USFI (BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF) and SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. USFI charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SCUB.

Performance

USFI vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

USFI

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.09%
• 6M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 3.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.79%

SCUB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	$5.71K	$11.41K	$8.72K
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF	$228.87	$276.61	$7.08K

USFI vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF	0.44%
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between USFI and SCUB is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.46

Return for Risk

USFI vs. SCUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USFI

USFI Risk / Return Rank: 65
USFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
USFI Omega Ratio Rank: 53
USFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
USFI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SCUB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USFI vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USFI	SCUB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.32	—	—

Drawdowns

USFI vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFI drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFI and SCUB.

Drawdown Indicators

	USFI	SCUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-0.18%	-8.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	0.00%	-1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-0.02%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USFI	SCUB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22%	0.87%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.85%	0.87%	+5.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.85%	0.87%	+5.98%

USFI vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

USFI vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison

USFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than SCUB's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF	4.46%	4.42%	4.60%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USFI and SCUB in my portfolio?

USFI and SCUB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USFI or SCUB?

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USFI or SCUB?

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for USFI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USFI or SCUB?

USFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.33% for SCUB.

What is the main difference between USFI and SCUB?

They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for USFI and 0.30% for SCUB.