PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINS vs. TOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINS vs. TOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TINS

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.76%
6M
10.01%
YTD
12.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TOT

1D
0.78%
1M
2.36%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINS vs. TOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TINS and TOT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINS vs. TOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TINS vs. TOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINS vs. TOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than TOT's maximum drawdown of -4.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and TOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINSTOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-4.26%

-6.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-0.62%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-1.45%

-0.71%

Volatility

TINS vs. TOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINSTOTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

14.24%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

14.24%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

14.24%

+3.37%

TINS vs. TOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TOT's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINS vs. TOT - Dividend Comparison

TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while TOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TINS and TOT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.

TINS has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.00% for TOT.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and LionShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.07% for TOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINS and TOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer