TOT vs. SCUB

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) and SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOT charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SCUB.

Performance

TOT vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TOT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCUB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOT vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.86%
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT and SCUB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.37

Return for Risk

TOT vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

TOT vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and SCUB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOT	SCUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-0.08%	-4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	0.00%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-0.01%	-1.44%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOT	SCUB	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	0.79%	+13.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.24%	0.79%	+13.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	0.79%	+13.45%

TOT vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOT vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison

TOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.

Position	TTM
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.33%
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOT and SCUB in my portfolio?

TOT and SCUB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TOT or SCUB?

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOT or SCUB?

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SCUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOT or SCUB?

SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for TOT.

What is the main difference between TOT and SCUB?

They also come from different issuers: LionShares and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 0.30% for SCUB.