TCV vs. RMRC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TCV (Towle Value ETF) and RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TCV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RMRC.

Performance

TCV vs. RMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Towle Value ETF (TCV) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TCV

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 3.05%
• 6M: 14.79%
• YTD: 26.87%
• 1Y: 42.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.39%

RMRC

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	$206.30K	$113.40K	$149.08K
TCV Towle Value ETF	$839.64K	$680.12K	$340.23K

TCV vs. RMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TCV Towle Value ETF	13.72%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TCV and RMRC is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.45

Return for Risk

TCV vs. RMRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCV

TCV Risk / Return Rank: 81
TCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
TCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
TCV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
TCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
TCV Martin Ratio Rank: 80

RMRC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCV vs. RMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Towle Value ETF (TCV) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCV	RMRC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.51	—	—

Drawdowns

TCV vs. RMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCV drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, which is greater than RMRC's maximum drawdown of -6.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCV and RMRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCV	RMRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-6.57%	-5.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-0.91%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-1.55%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TCV	RMRC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.43%	10.10%	+10.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	10.10%	+10.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	10.10%	+10.92%

TCV vs. RMRC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RMRC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCV vs. RMRC - Dividend Comparison

TCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than RMRC's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.58%	0.00%
TCV Towle Value ETF	0.57%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCV and RMRC in my portfolio?

TCV and RMRC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TCV or RMRC?

On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCV or RMRC?

RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCV or RMRC?

TCV and RMRC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.57%.

What is the main difference between TCV and RMRC?

TCV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while RMRC is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TCV and 0.60% for RMRC.