TINS vs. SEIX
TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and SEIX (Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton Investments, while SEIX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Virtus. Both are actively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for SEIX.
Performance
TINS vs. SEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINS achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than SEIX's 2.87% return.
TINS
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SEIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.93M | $1.60M | $1.87M | |
| $1.04K | $769.30 | $2.04K |
TINS vs. SEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 11.09% | 3.11% |
SEIX Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF | 2.87% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINS and SEIX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINS vs. SEIX — Risk / Return Rank
TINS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEIX
TINS vs. SEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINS | SEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.69 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINS vs. SEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum SEIX drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and SEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINS | SEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -17.51% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -0.26% | -3.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -0.86% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
TINS vs. SEIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINS | SEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 1.63% | +15.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 2.92% | +14.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 4.30% | +13.01% |
TINS vs. SEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINS vs. SEIX - Dividend Comparison
TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than SEIX's 7.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIX Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF | 7.17% | 7.52% | 8.09% | 8.74% | 5.76% | 4.16% | 3.75% | 3.82% |
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 0.21% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINS and SEIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TINS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TINS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for SEIX.
SEIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.
TINS is categorized as Actively Managed, while SEIX is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.57% for SEIX.
Find the right allocation for TINS and SEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer