PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIX vs. CLOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIX vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SEIX having a 2.33% return and CLOA slightly lower at 2.27%.


SEIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.49%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*

CLOA

1D
0.09%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.27%
6M
2.47%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIX vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
2.33%5.10%8.42%11.17%
CLOA
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
2.27%5.44%7.25%8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIX and CLOA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023

0.10

The correlation between SEIX and CLOA shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIX vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIX
SEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIX vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEIXCLOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

3.43

-1.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

29.72

-24.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.55

151.56

-130.01

SEIX vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 7.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIX and CLOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIX vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIX drawdown since its inception was -17.51%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIX and CLOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIXCLOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.51%

-1.34%

-16.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-0.18%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.01%

-1.13%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-0.05%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.03%

+0.25%

Volatility

SEIX vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) has a higher volatility of 0.33% compared to iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA) at 0.15%. This indicates that SEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIXCLOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.15%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.29%

0.49%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60%

0.69%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.92%

1.31%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.32%

1.31%

+3.01%

SEIX vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIX vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

SEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than CLOA's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CLOA
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
4.95%5.35%6.01%5.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
7.25%7.52%8.09%8.74%5.76%4.16%3.75%3.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIX and CLOA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIX has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to CLOA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIX dropped -17.51% vs CLOA's -1.34%.

On 3-year performance, SEIX leads with 7.76% vs 6.62% for CLOA. On fees, CLOA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIX has performed better with a 7.76% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLOA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for SEIX.

SEIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 4.95% for CLOA.

SEIX is categorized as Bank Loan, while CLOA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for SEIX and 0.20% for CLOA.

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.58 vs 3.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIX and CLOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer