PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSB vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSB vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCSB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.29%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
1.23%
1M
-4.96%
6M
39.30%
YTD
42.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSB vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCSB and POW is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSB vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCSB vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCSB vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSB drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSB and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSBPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-17.41%

+16.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-16.37%

+16.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-4.18%

+4.09%

Volatility

SCSB vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSBPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46%

32.79%

-31.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.46%

32.79%

-31.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.46%

32.79%

-31.33%

SCSB vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSB has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSB vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than POW's 0.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCSB and POW have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.13% for POW.

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SCSB and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSB and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer