SCSB vs. POW
SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCSB charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
SCSB vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCSB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- 6M
- 39.30%
- YTD
- 42.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCSB vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.07% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCSB and POW is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCSB vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCSB vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCSB drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSB and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCSB | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -17.41% | +16.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -16.37% | +16.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -4.18% | +4.09% |
Volatility
SCSB vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCSB | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 32.79% | -31.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 32.79% | -31.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.46% | 32.79% | -31.33% |
SCSB vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCSB has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCSB vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than POW's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% |
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF | 1.62% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCSB and POW have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.13% for POW.
They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SCSB and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for SCSB and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer