TINS vs. BVAL
TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and BVAL (Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton Investments, while BVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for BVAL.
Performance
TINS vs. BVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINS achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than BVAL's 12.78% return.
TINS
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BVAL
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $714.64K | $748.31K | $1.01M | |
| $1.04K | $769.30 | $2.04K |
TINS vs. BVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 11.09% | 3.11% |
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 12.78% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINS and BVAL is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINS vs. BVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TINS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BVAL
TINS vs. BVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINS | BVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINS vs. BVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, which is greater than BVAL's maximum drawdown of -6.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and BVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINS | BVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -6.69% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -1.32% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -0.87% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility
TINS vs. BVAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINS | BVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 10.38% | +6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 10.19% | +7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 10.19% | +7.12% |
TINS vs. BVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BVAL's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINS vs. BVAL - Dividend Comparison
TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than BVAL's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BVAL Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF | 1.33% | 0.73% |
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF | 0.21% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINS and BVAL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BVAL is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BVAL is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.
BVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.
TINS is categorized as Actively Managed, while BVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.24% for BVAL.
Find the right allocation for TINS and BVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer