PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BVAL vs. BLTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BVAL vs. BLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVAL achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than BLTD's 0.84% return.


BVAL

1D
-0.78%
1M
1.16%
YTD
11.82%
6M
11.16%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLTD

1D
0.18%
1M
1.46%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVAL vs. BLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BVAL
Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF
11.82%12.09%
BLTD
Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF
0.84%3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BVAL and BLTD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BVAL vs. BLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVAL
BVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BLTD
BLTD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVAL vs. BLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) and Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BVALBLTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.12

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

1.00

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.25

2.48

+12.77

BVAL vs. BLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the BLTD Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVAL and BLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BVAL vs. BLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVAL drawdown since its inception was -6.69%, which is greater than BLTD's maximum drawdown of -4.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVAL and BLTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BVALBLTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-4.80%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-4.80%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-1.92%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-1.60%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.94%

-0.33%

Volatility

BVAL vs. BLTD - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF (BVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF (BLTD) at 1.70%. This indicates that BVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BVALBLTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

1.70%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

5.04%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

6.82%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

6.82%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.38%

6.82%

+3.56%

BVAL vs. BLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVAL has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BLTD's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BVAL vs. BLTD - Dividend Comparison

BVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than BLTD's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BLTD
Bluemonte Long Term Bond ETF
3.91%2.48%
BVAL
Bluemonte Large Cap Value ETF
0.97%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


BVAL and BLTD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BVAL has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to BLTD (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVAL dropped -6.69% vs BLTD's -4.80%.

On 1-year performance, BVAL leads with 24.54% vs 4.79% for BLTD. On fees, BLTD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BLTD has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BVAL has performed better with a 24.54% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLTD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BVAL.

BLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.97% for BVAL.

BVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BLTD is Long-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BVAL and 0.23% for BLTD.

BVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BVAL and BLTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer