PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEAT vs. SOYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEAT vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly higher than SOYB's 15.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WEAT has underperformed SOYB with an annualized return of -4.69%, while SOYB has yielded a comparatively higher 3.22% annualized return.


WEAT

1D
-3.29%
1M
6.25%
6M
13.54%
YTD
19.23%
1Y
10.74%
3Y*
-10.44%
5Y*
-7.18%
10Y*
-4.69%
ALL TIME*
-10.45%

SOYB

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.95%
6M
13.13%
YTD
15.10%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
-3.34%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
3.22%
ALL TIME*
0.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.57M$2.15M$2.74M
$15.37M$12.62M$15.36M

WEAT vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
19.23%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%19.39%5.81%-1.35%-1.17%-12.79%
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
15.10%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%16.85%22.99%-2.16%-9.51%-6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and SOYB is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.40

The correlation between WEAT and SOYB shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEAT vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WEAT vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEATSOYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

2.13

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

5.60

-3.93

WEAT vs. SOYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the SOYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and SOYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than SOYB's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and SOYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEATSOYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-53.76%

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-8.78%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.21%

-30.61%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.83%

-31.01%

-36.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

-33.93%

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.22%

-14.16%

-67.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.30%

-25.64%

-37.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

3.33%

+2.44%

Volatility

WEAT vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) at 5.47%. This indicates that WEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEATSOYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

5.47%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

10.13%

+9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

13.37%

+9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.33%

17.12%

+13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

16.70%

+10.14%

WEAT vs. SOYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SOYB's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEAT vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEAT nor SOYB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WEAT and SOYB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEAT has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to SOYB (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs SOYB's -53.76%.

On 10-year performance, SOYB leads with 3.22% vs -4.69% for WEAT. On fees, SOYB is cheaper at 1.88% per year. On volatility, SOYB has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOYB has performed better with a 3.22% return vs -4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOYB is cheaper with a 1.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.

WEAT and SOYB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

WEAT tracks Teucrium Wheat Index (TWEAT), while SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark. Their fees differ too: 1.91% for WEAT and 1.88% for SOYB.

SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEAT and SOYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer