PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEAT vs. SOYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEAT vs. SOYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WEAT vs. SOYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
14.32%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%19.39%5.81%-1.35%-1.17%-12.79%
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
11.34%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%16.85%22.99%-2.16%-9.51%-6.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly higher than SOYB's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WEAT has underperformed SOYB with an annualized return of -6.59%, while SOYB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.94% annualized return.


WEAT

1D
-3.14%
1M
3.82%
YTD
14.32%
6M
10.56%
1Y
-3.26%
3Y*
-13.52%
5Y*
-5.06%
10Y*
-6.59%

SOYB

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.74%
YTD
11.34%
6M
12.01%
1Y
11.91%
3Y*
-3.56%
5Y*
2.75%
10Y*
2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WEAT vs. SOYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SOYB's 1.88% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WEAT vs. SOYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEAT vs. SOYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEATSOYBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

0.87

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

1.30

-1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.16

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

1.60

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.22

3.88

-4.09

WEAT vs. SOYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the SOYB Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and SOYB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEATSOYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

0.87

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.15

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

0.17

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-0.00

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and SOYB is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WEAT vs. SOYB - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEAT nor SOYB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. SOYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than SOYB's maximum drawdown of -53.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and SOYB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WEATSOYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-53.76%

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-8.78%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.83%

-31.01%

-36.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

-38.28%

-29.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.99%

-16.96%

-65.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.91%

-25.88%

-37.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.29%

3.63%

+7.66%

Volatility

WEAT vs. SOYB - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) at 5.41%. This indicates that WEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WEATSOYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

5.41%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

9.37%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.24%

13.89%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.49%

18.16%

+12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

17.09%

+9.65%