USE vs. COMB

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

USE (USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USE returned 9.17%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for COMB. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USE charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.

Performance

USE vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USE achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than COMB's 12.91% return.

USE

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -21.99%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 14.00%
• 1Y: 1.04%
• 3Y*: 9.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMB

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -11.53%
• YTD: 12.91%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 22.86%
• 3Y*: 10.90%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USE vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund	14.56%	-14.97%	22.58%	9.68%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	12.91%	15.12%	5.24%	1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between USE and COMB is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	0.48

Return for Risk

USE vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USE

USE Risk / Return Rank: 10
USE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
USE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
USE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
USE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
USE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 40
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 41
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USE vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USE	COMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	1.34	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	1.82	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.25	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	1.55	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.08	6.61	-6.53

USE vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USE and COMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USE vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USE drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USE and COMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	USE	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.38%	-33.50%	+7.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-14.84%	-11.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.38%	-14.84%	-11.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.38%	-14.84%	-11.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.10%	-12.04%	+3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.89%	3.47%	+10.42%

Volatility

USE vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) at 3.91%. This indicates that USE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USE	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.45%	3.91%	+6.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.74%	15.35%	+12.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.31%	17.33%	+13.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.40%	16.71%	+10.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.40%	15.15%	+12.25%

USE vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

USE vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

USE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than COMB's 8.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	8.02%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%
USE USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund	2.67%	3.06%	38.65%	4.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USE and COMB in my portfolio?

USE and COMB have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USE or COMB?

USE has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to COMB (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USE dropped -26.38% vs COMB's -33.50%.

Which ETF is better, USE or COMB?

On 3-year performance, COMB leads with 10.90% vs 9.17% for USE. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, COMB has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USE or COMB?

Over the 3-year period, COMB has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USE or COMB?

COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for USE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USE or COMB?

COMB has the higher dividend yield at 8.02%, compared with 2.67% for USE.

What is the main difference between USE and COMB?

They also come from different issuers: USCF and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for USE and 0.25% for COMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.