TILL vs. GRN
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and GRN (iPath Series B Carbon ETN) are both Commodities funds. TILL is actively managed, while GRN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -5.74%/yr vs -1.57%/yr for GRN. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRN.
Performance
TILL vs. GRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly higher than GRN's -10.45% return.
TILL
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- -5.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRN
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -7.22%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- —
TILL vs. GRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 5.10% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | -10.45% | 20.33% | -7.34% | -2.99% | -11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and GRN is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. GRN — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
GRN
TILL vs. GRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILL | GRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.23 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 0.60 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILL | GRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 0.26 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.56 | 0.41 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
TILL vs. GRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum GRN drawdown of -47.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and GRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | GRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -47.96% | +14.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -30.39% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.40% | -45.30% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.47% | -21.35% | -8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -17.54% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 11.87% | -6.46% |
Volatility
TILL vs. GRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 5.38%, while iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | GRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 5.88% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 24.53% | -14.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 27.73% | -15.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 39.83% | -25.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 41.94% | -27.20% |
TILL vs. GRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GRN's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. GRN - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while GRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILL and GRN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRN has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to TILL (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs GRN's -47.96%.
On 3-year performance, GRN leads with -1.57% vs -5.74% for TILL. On fees, GRN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GRN has performed better with a -1.57% return vs -5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GRN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.00% for GRN.
They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.75% for GRN.
GRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILL and GRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer