TILL vs. GDMN
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -8.51%/yr vs 53.36%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
TILL vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -21.74% return.
TILL
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- -0.92%
- 3Y*
- -8.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDMN
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -22.46%
- YTD
- -21.74%
- 6M
- -27.72%
- 1Y
- 48.92%
- 3Y*
- 53.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TILL vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.90% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -11.52% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -21.74% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and GDMN is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.08 |
The correlation between TILL and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
GDMN
TILL vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TILL | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.18 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 0.99 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 2.52 | -2.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TILL vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -52.82% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -49.72% | +39.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -49.72% | +20.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.27% | -48.62% | +18.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.50% | -19.19% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 19.48% | -14.49% |
Volatility
TILL vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 3.23%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 22.75% | -19.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 55.39% | -44.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 64.36% | -51.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 48.30% | -33.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 48.30% | -33.60% |
TILL vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than GDMN's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.45% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.78% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILL and GDMN have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to TILL (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 53.36% vs -8.51% for TILL. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 53.36% return vs -8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.45% for GDMN.
They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.45% for GDMN.
GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILL and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer