GDMN vs. GLD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. GDMN is actively managed, while GLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDMN returned 62.97%/yr vs 31.53%/yr for GLD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDMN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.

Performance

GDMN vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 3.95% return.

GDMN

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -2.21%
• YTD: -0.46%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 82.68%
• 3Y*: 62.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLD

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 3.95%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 32.18%
• 3Y*: 31.53%
• 5Y*: 18.64%
• 10Y*: 13.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDMN vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-0.46%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	5.11%
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	3.95%	63.68%	26.66%	12.69%	-0.77%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GDMN and GLD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.90

The correlation between GDMN and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

GDMN vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDMN	GLD
Basic Materials	100.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GDMN vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 39
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

GLD

GLD Risk / Return Rank: 34
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMN vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDMN	GLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.22	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.61	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.24	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.86	+0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	4.66	+1.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDMN vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMN and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDMN	GLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	1.22	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.60	+0.23

Drawdowns

GDMN vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and GLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDMN	GLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.82%	-45.56%	-7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.03%	-19.21%	-19.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.03%	-19.21%	-19.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.66%	-16.93%	-17.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.87%	-16.16%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.34%	7.65%	+8.69%

Volatility

GDMN vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a higher volatility of 17.89% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.78%. This indicates that GDMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDMN	GLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.89%	5.78%	+12.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.66%	23.14%	+28.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.52%	26.71%	+34.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.57%	18.02%	+29.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.57%	15.95%	+31.62%

GDMN vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDMN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDMN vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.71%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDMN and GLD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GDMN and GLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GDMN or GLD?

GDMN has higher volatility (17.89%) compared to GLD (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMN dropped -52.82% vs GLD's -45.56%.

Which ETF is better, GDMN or GLD?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 62.97% vs 31.53% for GLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDMN or GLD?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 62.97% return vs 31.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDMN or GLD?

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDMN or GLD?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

What is the main difference between GDMN and GLD?

GDMN is categorized as Commodities, while GLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GDMN and 0.40% for GLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.