TILL vs. CCRV
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. TILL is actively managed, while CCRV is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CCRV.
Performance
TILL vs. CCRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TILL
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- -5.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TILL vs. CCRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 5.10% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and CCRV is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TILL and CCRV has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. CCRV — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
CCRV
TILL vs. CCRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILL | CCRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILL | CCRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.56 | — | — |
Drawdowns
TILL vs. CCRV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | CCRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.47% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | — | — |
Volatility
TILL vs. CCRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | CCRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | — | — |
TILL vs. CCRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CCRV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. CCRV - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILL and CCRV have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.40% for CCRV.
Find the right allocation for TILL and CCRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer