CCRV vs. VGT
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCRV is a Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
CCRV vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 24.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $440.89M | $515.41M | $573.34M |
CCRV vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | 19.91% | 33.78% | 7.16% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 20.36% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 5.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and VGT is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.13 |
The correlation between CCRV and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGT
CCRV vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRV | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -54.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -9.93% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.95% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.07% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 24.28% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 25.83% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.89% | — |
CCRV vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and VGT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while VGT is Technology Equities. CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer