TILL vs. BSMW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. TILL is actively managed, while BSMW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -6.03%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for BSMW. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.

Performance

TILL vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.39% return.

TILL

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 5.00%
• 6M: 8.63%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: -6.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMW

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 1Y: 5.78%
• 3Y*: 2.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILL vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	8.34%	-5.97%	-13.98%	-1.92%
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	1.39%	3.42%	-0.35%	7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TILL and BSMW is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2023	0.02

The correlation between TILL and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TILL vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILL

TILL Risk / Return Rank: 14
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 14

BSMW

BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 72
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILL vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TILL	BSMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	2.20	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	3.12	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.45	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	1.99	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.89	6.06	-5.17

TILL vs. BSMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the BSMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and BSMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TILL vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and BSMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILL	BSMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-7.57%	-26.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.87%	-2.92%	-6.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.46%	-7.34%	-22.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.29%	-0.89%	-26.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.58%	-1.70%	-19.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	0.96%	+3.52%

Volatility

TILL vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.44%. This indicates that TILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILL	BSMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	0.44%	+3.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.74%	1.93%	+8.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	2.64%	+9.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.72%	4.93%	+9.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.72%	4.93%	+9.79%

TILL vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

TILL vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than BSMW's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	3.20%	3.24%	3.48%	2.36%	0.00%
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.58%	4.97%	2.55%	51.24%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TILL and BSMW in my portfolio?

TILL and BSMW have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TILL or BSMW?

TILL has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to BSMW (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs BSMW's -7.57%.

Which ETF is better, TILL or BSMW?

On 3-year performance, BSMW leads with 2.74% vs -6.03% for TILL. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TILL or BSMW?

Over the 3-year period, BSMW has performed better with a 2.74% return vs -6.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TILL or BSMW?

BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TILL or BSMW?

TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.20% for BSMW.

What is the main difference between TILL and BSMW?

TILL is categorized as Commodities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.18% for BSMW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.