TIIV vs. SAWS
TIIV (AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF) and SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIIV is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by AAM, while SAWS is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by AAM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TIIV returned 25.15% vs 22.70% for SAWS. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TIIV charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SAWS.
Performance
TIIV vs. SAWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIIV achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly lower than SAWS's 13.99% return.
TIIV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.71%
SAWS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 22.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.66K | $49.04K | $36.96K | |
| $18.60K | $14.86K | $76.21K |
TIIV vs. SAWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF | 11.86% | 10.83% |
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 13.99% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIIV and SAWS is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between TIIV and SAWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIIV vs. SAWS — Risk / Return Rank
TIIV
SAWS
TIIV vs. SAWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIIV | SAWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.21 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.23 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 6.72 | +2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIIV vs. SAWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum SAWS drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and SAWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIIV | SAWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -22.04% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -10.23% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -7.62% | +6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -5.39% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.38% | -0.60% |
Volatility
TIIV vs. SAWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) is 3.16%, while AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that TIIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIIV | SAWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 5.30% | -2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 14.62% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 18.98% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 20.90% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 20.90% | -6.52% |
TIIV vs. SAWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SAWS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIIV vs. SAWS - Dividend Comparison
TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than SAWS's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF | 3.18% | 2.33% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIIV and SAWS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAWS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to TIIV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIIV dropped -9.68% vs SAWS's -22.04%.
On 1-year performance, TIIV leads with 25.15% vs 22.70% for SAWS. On fees, TIIV is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, TIIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TIIV has performed better with a 25.15% return vs 22.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIIV is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SAWS.
TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.02% for SAWS.
TIIV is categorized as Actively Managed, while SAWS is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.55% for SAWS.
TIIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIIV and SAWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer