PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIIV vs. SAWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIIV vs. SAWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIIV achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than SAWS's 19.04% return.


TIIV

1D
0.61%
1M
3.12%
6M
8.82%
YTD
11.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SAWS

1D
1.18%
1M
5.11%
6M
15.31%
YTD
19.04%
1Y
27.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIIV vs. SAWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIIV and SAWS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIIV vs. SAWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SAWS
SAWS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SAWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIIV vs. SAWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIIVSAWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

TIIV vs. SAWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIIV vs. SAWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum SAWS drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and SAWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIIVSAWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-22.04%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-3.52%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-5.39%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

Volatility

TIIV vs. SAWS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIIVSAWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

18.87%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

21.02%

-6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

21.02%

-6.41%

TIIV vs. SAWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SAWS's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIIV vs. SAWS - Dividend Comparison

TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SAWS's 0.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TIIV and SAWS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIIV is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIIV is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SAWS.

TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.02% for SAWS.

TIIV is categorized as Actively Managed, while SAWS is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.55% for SAWS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIIV and SAWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer