PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIIV vs. SAWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIIV vs. SAWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIIV achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly lower than SAWS's 13.99% return.


TIIV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.59%
6M
5.27%
YTD
11.86%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.71%

SAWS

1D
-2.06%
1M
-6.40%
6M
9.24%
YTD
13.99%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.66K$49.04K$36.96K
$18.60K$14.86K$76.21K

TIIV vs. SAWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIIV and SAWS is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.60

The correlation between TIIV and SAWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIIV vs. SAWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIIV
TIIV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TIIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TIIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SAWS
SAWS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SAWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIIV vs. SAWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIIVSAWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.23

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

6.72

+2.37

TIIV vs. SAWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the SAWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIIV and SAWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIIV vs. SAWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum SAWS drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and SAWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIIVSAWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-22.04%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-10.23%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-7.62%

+6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-5.39%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.38%

-0.60%

Volatility

TIIV vs. SAWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) is 3.16%, while AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that TIIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIIVSAWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

5.30%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

14.62%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

18.98%

-4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

20.90%

-6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

20.90%

-6.52%

TIIV vs. SAWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SAWS's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIIV vs. SAWS - Dividend Comparison

TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than SAWS's 0.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TIIV and SAWS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAWS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to TIIV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIIV dropped -9.68% vs SAWS's -22.04%.

On 1-year performance, TIIV leads with 25.15% vs 22.70% for SAWS. On fees, TIIV is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, TIIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIIV has performed better with a 25.15% return vs 22.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIIV is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SAWS.

TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.02% for SAWS.

TIIV is categorized as Actively Managed, while SAWS is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.55% for SAWS.

TIIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIIV and SAWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer