TIIV vs. TACN
TIIV (AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF) and TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TIIV charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TACN.
Performance
TIIV vs. TACN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIIV achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than TACN's 10.54% return.
TIIV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.71%
TACN
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $184.69K | $112.68K | $82.44K | |
| $18.60K | $14.86K | $76.21K |
TIIV vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF | 11.86% | 1.12% |
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 10.54% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIIV and TACN is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIIV vs. TACN — Risk / Return Rank
TIIV
TACN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TIIV vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIIV | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIIV vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum TACN drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and TACN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIIV | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -10.98% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -1.53% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -2.32% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | — | — |
Volatility
TIIV vs. TACN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIIV | TACN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 17.14% | -2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 17.14% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 17.14% | -2.76% |
TIIV vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIIV vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison
TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF | 3.18% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, TIIV and TACN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.
TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.
They also come from different issuers: AAM and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.20% for TACN.
Find the right allocation for TIIV and TACN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer