PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIIV vs. TACN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIIV vs. TACN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TIIV having a 11.37% return and TACN slightly lower at 10.93%.


TIIV

1D
0.61%
1M
3.12%
6M
8.82%
YTD
11.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TACN

1D
0.39%
1M
2.67%
6M
8.65%
YTD
10.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIIV vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TIIV and TACN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIIV vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TIIV vs. TACN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIIV vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum TACN drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and TACN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIIVTACNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-10.98%

+1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.18%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-2.42%

+0.55%

Volatility

TIIV vs. TACN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIIVTACNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

17.59%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

17.59%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

17.59%

-2.98%

TIIV vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIIV vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison

TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TIIV and TACN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.

TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.

They also come from different issuers: AAM and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.20% for TACN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIIV and TACN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer