SAWS vs. SAWG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) and SAWG (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAWS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AAM, while SAWG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AAM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SAWS returned 30.13% vs 18.49% for SAWG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAWS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SAWG.

Performance

SAWS vs. SAWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWS achieves a 19.49% return, which is significantly higher than SAWG's 5.60% return.

SAWS

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 8.58%
• YTD: 19.49%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 30.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAWG

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 5.60%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 18.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAWS vs. SAWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF	19.49%	7.26%	4.18%
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF	5.60%	11.30%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SAWS and SAWG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024	0.71

The correlation between SAWS and SAWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAWS vs. SAWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAWS	SAWG
Industrials	25.3%	7.4%
Healthcare	21.1%	14.4%
Technology	16.1%	46.2%
Financial Services	12.1%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	3.6%
Energy	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	-
Communication Services	0.7%	8.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SAWS vs. SAWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAWS

SAWS Risk / Return Rank: 56
SAWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SAWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SAWS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SAWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SAWS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SAWG

SAWG Risk / Return Rank: 42
SAWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SAWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SAWG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SAWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SAWG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAWS vs. SAWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAWS	SAWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.44	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.03	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	1.64	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	6.75	+2.89

SAWS vs. SAWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the SAWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWS and SAWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAWS vs. SAWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWS drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, which is greater than SAWG's maximum drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWS and SAWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAWS	SAWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-18.68%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-11.33%	+1.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-3.32%	+2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-2.63%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	2.74%	+0.39%

Volatility

SAWS vs. SAWG - Volatility Comparison

AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) at 4.57%. This indicates that SAWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAWS	SAWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	4.57%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	10.38%	+3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	12.92%	+5.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	16.27%	+4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	16.27%	+4.75%

SAWS vs. SAWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SAWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAWS vs. SAWG - Dividend Comparison

SAWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SAWG's 0.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF	0.26%	0.27%	0.16%
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAWS and SAWG in my portfolio?

SAWS and SAWG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAWS or SAWG?

SAWS has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SAWG (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAWS dropped -22.04% vs SAWG's -18.68%.

Which ETF is better, SAWS or SAWG?

On 1-year performance, SAWS leads with 30.13% vs 18.49% for SAWG. On fees, SAWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SAWG has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAWS or SAWG?

Over the 1-year period, SAWS has performed better with a 30.13% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAWS or SAWG?

SAWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SAWS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAWS or SAWG?

SAWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.02% for SAWS.

What is the main difference between SAWS and SAWG?

SAWS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SAWG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SAWS and 0.49% for SAWG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.