SAWS vs. SAWG

Last updated Apr 17, 2026

SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) and SAWG (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — SAWS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AAM, while SAWG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AAM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SAWS returned 25.24% vs 26.70% for SAWG. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAWS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SAWG.

Performance

SAWS vs. SAWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWS achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than SAWG's 1.17% return.

SAWS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 5.88%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 25.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAWG

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.42%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAWS vs. SAWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF	7.63%	7.26%	3.52%
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF	1.17%	11.30%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SAWS and SAWG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024	0.72

The correlation between SAWS and SAWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 — a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SAWS vs. SAWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAWS

SAWS Risk / Return Rank: 32
SAWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SAWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SAWS Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SAWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SAWS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

SAWG

SAWG Risk / Return Rank: 43
SAWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SAWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SAWG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SAWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SAWG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAWS vs. SAWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAWS	SAWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.06	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.89	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.36	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	2.07	+0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.98	8.56	-0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAWS vs. SAWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the SAWG Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWS and SAWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAWS	SAWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	2.06	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.65	-0.13

Drawdowns

SAWS vs. SAWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWS drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, which is greater than SAWG's maximum drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWS and SAWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAWS	SAWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-18.68%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-11.33%	+1.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-0.71%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-2.84%	-3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	2.75%	+0.29%

Volatility

SAWS vs. SAWG - Volatility Comparison

AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) at 5.62%. This indicates that SAWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAWS	SAWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	5.62%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.68%	9.83%	+3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.21%	13.31%	+4.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.26%	16.49%	+4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.26%	16.49%	+4.77%

SAWS vs. SAWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SAWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAWS vs. SAWG - Dividend Comparison

SAWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than SAWG's 0.27% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF	0.27%	0.27%	0.16%