SAWS vs. RZG
SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) and RZG (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SAWS is actively managed, while RZG is passively managed. Over the past year, SAWS returned 25.24% vs 40.94% for RZG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAWS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RZG.
Performance
SAWS vs. RZG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAWS achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 13.45% return.
SAWS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RZG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 40.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
SAWS vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 7.63% | 7.26% | 3.52% |
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 13.45% | 10.22% | -5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAWS and RZG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SAWS and RZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAWS vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank
SAWS
RZG
SAWS vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAWS | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.19 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 3.12 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 4.54 | -2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 15.46 | -7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAWS | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.19 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.37 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SAWS vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAWS drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWS and RZG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAWS | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -58.52% | +36.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -8.63% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -0.41% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -12.20% | +6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.54% | +0.50% |
Volatility
SAWS vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is 7.20%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that SAWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAWS | RZG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 7.73% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 14.17% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.21% | 18.96% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 23.12% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 24.62% | -3.36% |
SAWS vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAWS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RZG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAWS vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison
SAWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than RZG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.37% | 0.95% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.70% |