TIIV vs. BINT

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TIIV (AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF) and BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIIV is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by AAM, while BINT is a Global Equities fund managed by Bluemonte. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TIIV charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BINT.

Performance

TIIV vs. BINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIIV achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than BINT's 14.43% return.

TIIV

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 3.12%
• 6M: 8.82%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINT

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 11.95%
• YTD: 14.43%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIIV vs. BINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	11.37%	10.83%
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	14.43%	8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TIIV and BINT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

TIIV vs. BINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIIV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 63
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIIV vs. BINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF (TIIV) and Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TIIV	BINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.39	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.60	—

Drawdowns

TIIV vs. BINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIIV drawdown since its inception was -9.68%, smaller than the maximum BINT drawdown of -10.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIIV and BINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIIV	BINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.68%	-10.94%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-2.06%	+1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-1.53%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TIIV	BINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	15.89%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	15.69%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.61%	15.69%	-1.08%

TIIV vs. BINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIIV has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BINT's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIIV vs. BINT - Dividend Comparison

TIIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than BINT's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.74%	1.08%
TIIV AAM Todd International Intrinsic Value ETF	3.20%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIIV and BINT in my portfolio?

TIIV and BINT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TIIV or BINT?

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TIIV or BINT?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TIIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TIIV or BINT?

TIIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.74% for BINT.

What is the main difference between TIIV and BINT?

TIIV is categorized as Actively Managed, while BINT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: AAM and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TIIV and 0.23% for BINT.