PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAWS vs. ESML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAWS vs. ESML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWS achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than ESML's 9.70% return.


SAWS

1D
-0.05%
1M
5.88%
YTD
7.63%
6M
9.50%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESML

1D
0.38%
1M
6.29%
YTD
9.70%
6M
12.51%
1Y
43.41%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAWS vs. ESML - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SAWS and ESML is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024

0.89

The correlation between SAWS and ESML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAWS vs. ESML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAWS
SAWS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SAWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ESML
ESML Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ESML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESML Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ESML Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESML Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAWS vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAWSESMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.50

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

3.50

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

4.62

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.98

16.98

-9.00

SAWS vs. ESML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the ESML Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWS and ESML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAWSESMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.50

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.43

+0.09

Drawdowns

SAWS vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWS drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum ESML drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWS and ESML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SAWSESMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.04%

-41.97%

+19.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-9.04%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

0.00%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-9.10%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.46%

+0.58%

Volatility

SAWS vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison

AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) at 6.24%. This indicates that SAWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SAWSESMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

6.24%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

12.50%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

17.60%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.26%

21.31%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

23.52%

-2.26%

SAWS vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAWS vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison

SAWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than ESML's 1.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SAWS
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
1.01%1.08%1.22%1.31%1.46%0.94%0.99%1.10%1.07%