SAWS vs. ESML
SAWS (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF) and ESML (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SAWS is actively managed, while ESML is passively managed. Over the past year, SAWS returned 25.24% vs 43.41% for ESML. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAWS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ESML.
Performance
SAWS vs. ESML - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAWS achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than ESML's 9.70% return.
SAWS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESML
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 43.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
SAWS vs. ESML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 7.63% | 7.26% | 3.52% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 9.70% | 10.62% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAWS and ESML is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SAWS and ESML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAWS vs. ESML — Risk / Return Rank
SAWS
ESML
SAWS vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAWS | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.50 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 3.50 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 4.62 | -2.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 16.98 | -9.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAWS | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.50 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.43 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
SAWS vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAWS drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum ESML drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWS and ESML.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAWS | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -41.97% | +19.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -9.04% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | 0.00% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -9.10% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.46% | +0.58% |
Volatility
SAWS vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) at 6.24%. This indicates that SAWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAWS | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 6.24% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 12.50% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.21% | 17.60% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 21.31% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 23.52% | -2.26% |
SAWS vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAWS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAWS vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison
SAWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than ESML's 1.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAWS AAM Sawgrass U.S. Small Cap Quality Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% |