TIER vs. EFAV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TIER (T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF) and EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TIER is actively managed, while EFAV is passively managed. Over the past year, TIER returned 28.71% vs 16.01% for EFAV. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TIER charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.

Performance

TIER vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIER achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 9.79% return.

TIER

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 7.64%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 1Y: 28.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.17%

EFAV

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 4.40%
• 6M: 6.21%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 6.38%
• ALL TIME*: 7.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF	$54.17M	$49.40M	$45.31M
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF	$89.46K	$365.95K	$202.50K

TIER vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF	13.45%	12.72%
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF	9.79%	5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TIER and EFAV is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.60

The correlation between TIER and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

TIER vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TIER	EFAV
Financial Services	24.7%	19.7%
Technology	24.4%	4.4%
Industrials	13.4%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	5.1%
Basic Materials	6.6%	1.6%
Healthcare	5.8%	12.2%
Communication Services	5.1%	9.1%
Energy	4.6%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	12.6%
Utilities	2.5%	9.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	2.9%

Return for Risk

TIER vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIER

TIER Risk / Return Rank: 71
TIER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TIER Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TIER Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TIER Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TIER Martin Ratio Rank: 71

EFAV

EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 69
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIER vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TIER	EFAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.64	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.35	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.62	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.83	6.10	+2.73

TIER vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIER Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIER and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TIER vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIER drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIER and EFAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIER	EFAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.07%	-27.56%	+15.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.07%	-6.66%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-1.09%	-1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-4.76%	+2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	2.86%	+0.34%

Volatility

TIER vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 3.28%. This indicates that TIER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIER	EFAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	3.28%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.16%	8.85%	+6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	10.67%	+6.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	11.88%	+4.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	13.03%	+3.50%

TIER vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIER has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

TIER vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

TIER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than EFAV's 3.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF	3.07%	3.20%	3.24%	3.08%	2.53%	2.47%	1.33%	4.19%	3.34%	2.45%	3.94%	2.49%
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF	0.66%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIER and EFAV in my portfolio?

TIER and EFAV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TIER or EFAV?

TIER has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to EFAV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIER dropped -12.07% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

Which ETF is better, TIER or EFAV?

On 1-year performance, TIER leads with 28.71% vs 16.01% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TIER or EFAV?

Over the 1-year period, TIER has performed better with a 28.71% return vs 16.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TIER or EFAV?

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TIER.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TIER or EFAV?

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.66% for TIER.

What is the main difference between TIER and EFAV?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TIER and 0.20% for EFAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.