TIER vs. CIL
TIER (T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TIER is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TIER charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.
Performance
TIER vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIER achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.
TIER
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
TIER vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 13.19% | 12.72% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIER and CIL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.61 |
TIER vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TIER
CIL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
TIER
CIL
Financial Services
TIER
CIL
Industrials
TIER
CIL
Consumer Cyclical
TIER
CIL
Basic Materials
TIER
CIL
Healthcare
TIER
CIL
Communication Services
TIER
CIL
Energy
TIER
CIL
Consumer Defensive
TIER
CIL
Utilities
TIER
CIL
Real Estate
TIER
CIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIER vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
TIER
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CIL
TIER vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIER | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIER vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIER drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIER and CIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIER | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -36.27% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -0.58% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -6.53% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility
TIER vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIER | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 7.66% | +8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 16.47% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 17.08% | -0.59% |
TIER vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIER has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIER vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
TIER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than CIL's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.20% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 0.66% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIER and CIL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIER is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIER is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.
CIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.66% for TIER.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TIER and 0.45% for CIL.
Find the right allocation for TIER and CIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer