THNR vs. HACK

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

THNR (Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THNR is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the VettaFi Weight Loss Drug & Treatment Index, while HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, THNR returned 7.44% vs 16.58% for HACK. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THNR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.

Performance

THNR vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNR achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 19.45% return.

THNR

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: -4.38%
• 6M: -3.81%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HACK

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 19.45%
• 6M: 17.62%
• 1Y: 16.58%
• 3Y*: 23.59%
• 5Y*: 9.74%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THNR vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
THNR Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF	-4.38%	13.65%	-10.47%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	19.45%	7.97%	18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between THNR and HACK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024	0.26

The correlation between THNR and HACK shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

THNR vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THNR	HACK
Healthcare	98.8%	-
Financial Services	1.1%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	7.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	92.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

THNR vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNR

THNR Risk / Return Rank: 14
THNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
THNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
THNR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
THNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
THNR Martin Ratio Rank: 14

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 18
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNR vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THNR	HACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	0.59	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	0.95	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.12	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	0.74	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	1.75	-0.51

THNR vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNR and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

THNR vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNR drawdown since its inception was -32.51%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNR and HACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	THNR	HACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.51%	-42.68%	+10.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-20.67%	+8.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.25%	-8.89%	-3.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.22%	-11.62%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.44%	8.76%	-3.32%

Volatility

THNR vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) is 5.65%, while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that THNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THNR	HACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	11.80%	-6.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.63%	22.02%	-8.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.99%	26.03%	-7.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.34%	24.28%	-4.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	23.33%	-3.99%

THNR vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

THNR vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

THNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%
THNR Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF	1.71%	1.64%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THNR and HACK in my portfolio?

THNR and HACK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THNR or HACK?

HACK has higher volatility (11.80%) compared to THNR (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNR dropped -32.51% vs HACK's -42.68%.

Which ETF is better, THNR or HACK?

On 1-year performance, HACK leads with 16.58% vs 7.44% for THNR. On fees, THNR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, THNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THNR or HACK?

Over the 1-year period, HACK has performed better with a 16.58% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THNR or HACK?

THNR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THNR or HACK?

THNR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

What is the main difference between THNR and HACK?

THNR is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while HACK is Technology Equities. THNR tracks VettaFi Weight Loss Drug & Treatment Index, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for THNR and 0.60% for HACK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.