THNQ vs. GXPT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - THNQ tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.

Performance

THNQ vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 36.10% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.86% return.

THNQ

• 1D: -3.25%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 36.10%
• 6M: 33.52%
• 1Y: 66.41%
• 3Y*: 35.10%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: —

GXPT

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 16.86%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THNQ vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	36.10%	14.88%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	16.86%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and GXPT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

THNQ vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 70
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

GXPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THNQ vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THNQ	GXPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	—	—

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and GXPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	THNQ	GXPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.56%	-18.74%	-31.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.60%	-8.72%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-5.04%	-9.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	THNQ	GXPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.49%	22.91%	+5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.48%	22.91%	+6.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.89%	22.91%	+5.98%

THNQ vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

THNQ vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.12%	0.14%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THNQ and GXPT in my portfolio?

THNQ and GXPT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, THNQ or GXPT?

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, THNQ or GXPT?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THNQ or GXPT?

THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.

What is the main difference between THNQ and GXPT?

THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.15% for GXPT.