THNQ vs. LRNZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. THNQ is passively managed, while LRNZ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

THNQ vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

THNQ

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -4.13%
• 6M: 31.35%
• YTD: 33.15%
• 1Y: 55.63%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: 14.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.75%

LRNZ

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	$103.68K	$133.76K	$133.76K
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	$1.82M	$1.71M	$2.47M

THNQ vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	-6.04%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and LRNZ is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	0.94

THNQ vs. LRNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THNQ	LRNZ
Technology	78.5%	76.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	-
Communication Services	4.3%	4.0%
Healthcare	3.8%	19.5%
Industrials	1.3%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

THNQ vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

LRNZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THNQ vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THNQ	LRNZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.92	—	—

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	THNQ	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.56%	-11.91%	-38.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.60%	-6.20%	-3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.88%	-5.75%	-9.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	THNQ	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.08%	34.30%	-4.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.80%	34.30%	-4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.97%	34.30%	-5.33%

THNQ vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both THNQ and LRNZ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

THNQ vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THNQ and LRNZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, THNQ and LRNZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, THNQ or LRNZ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, THNQ or LRNZ?

THNQ and LRNZ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THNQ or LRNZ?

THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between THNQ and LRNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and TrueShares.