THNQ vs. LRNZ

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a -14.98% return, which is significantly higher than LRNZ's -15.76% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both THNQ and LRNZ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the LRNZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and LRNZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither THNQ nor LRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -61.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and LRNZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) is 18.45%, while TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has a volatility of 20.28%. This indicates that THNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.