PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THNQ vs. ROBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THNQ vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 33.15% return, which is significantly higher than ROBO's 14.34% return.


THNQ

1D
1.65%
1M
-4.13%
6M
31.35%
YTD
33.15%
1Y
55.63%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.75%

ROBO

1D
0.85%
1M
-4.96%
6M
9.49%
YTD
14.34%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.10M$12.55M$20.11M
$1.82M$1.71M$2.47M

THNQ vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
33.15%29.83%18.82%56.81%-39.84%9.10%60.92%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
14.34%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%52.91%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and ROBO is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.84

The correlation between THNQ and ROBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

THNQ vs. ROBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THNQ
ROBO

Technology

78.5%
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
4.3%

Communication Services

4.3%
0.7%

Healthcare

3.8%
5.4%

Industrials

1.3%
47.1%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

0.9%
1.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

1.3%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

THNQ
78.5%
ROBO
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

THNQ
11.1%
ROBO
4.3%

Communication Services

THNQ
4.3%
ROBO
0.7%

Healthcare

THNQ
3.8%
ROBO
5.4%

Industrials

THNQ
1.3%
ROBO
47.1%

Real Estate

THNQ
1.3%
ROBO

-

Financial Services

THNQ
0.9%
ROBO
1.5%

Basic Materials

THNQ

-

ROBO

-

Consumer Defensive

THNQ

-

ROBO
1.3%

Energy

THNQ

-

ROBO

-

Utilities

THNQ

-

ROBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THNQ vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THNQ vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THNQROBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.19

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.60

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

4.75

+3.18

THNQ vs. ROBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the ROBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and ROBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and ROBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THNQROBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.56%

-43.65%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.39%

-17.35%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.88%

-27.92%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

-43.65%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-12.28%

+2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-12.88%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

5.85%

+0.60%

Volatility

THNQ vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) have volatilities of 9.75% and 9.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THNQROBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.75%

9.79%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.75%

22.47%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.08%

26.46%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.80%

24.41%

+5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.97%

23.47%

+5.50%

THNQ vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

THNQ vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than ROBO's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.37%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.15%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THNQ and ROBO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBO has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to THNQ (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs ROBO's -43.65%.

On 5-year performance, THNQ leads with 14.49% vs 4.04% for ROBO. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 14.49% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

THNQ is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while ROBO is Robotics. THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.95% for ROBO.

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THNQ and ROBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer