THMR vs. BSR
THMR (THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF) and BSR (Beacon Selective Risk ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. THMR is actively managed, while BSR is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.10% expense ratio.
Performance
THMR vs. BSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
THMR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THMR vs. BSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
THMR THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF | 1.65% |
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between THMR and BSR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THMR vs. BSR — Risk / Return Rank
THMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSR
THMR vs. BSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) and Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THMR | BSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THMR vs. BSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THMR drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum BSR drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMR and BSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THMR | BSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -15.68% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -4.34% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -4.58% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.39% | — |
Volatility
THMR vs. BSR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THMR | BSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 8.80% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 16.05% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 16.05% | -1.14% |
THMR vs. BSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both THMR and BSR have an expense ratio of 1.10%.
Dividends
THMR vs. BSR - Dividend Comparison
THMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF | 2.80% | 2.89% | 0.89% | 1.08% |
THMR THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THMR and BSR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THMR and BSR have the same expense ratio: 1.10% per year.
BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.00% for THMR.
They also come from different issuers: THOR Financial Technologies and American Beacon.
Find the right allocation for THMR and BSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer