THMR vs. ELM
THMR (THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF) and ELM (Elm Market Navigator ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THMR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ELM.
Performance
THMR vs. ELM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
THMR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THMR vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
THMR THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF | 1.65% |
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF | 5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between THMR and ELM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THMR vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank
THMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ELM
THMR vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THMR | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THMR vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THMR drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum ELM drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMR and ELM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THMR | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -9.02% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -0.68% | -5.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -1.31% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
THMR vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THMR | ELM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 9.81% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 10.34% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 10.34% | +4.57% |
THMR vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison
THMR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
THMR vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison
THMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ELM Elm Market Navigator ETF | 2.53% | 2.71% |
THMR THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THMR and ELM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for THMR.
ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.00% for THMR.
They also come from different issuers: THOR Financial Technologies and Elm. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for THMR and 0.24% for ELM.
Find the right allocation for THMR and ELM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer