BSR vs. AHLT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BSR (Beacon Selective Risk ETF) and AHLT (American Beacon AHL Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSR is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the NONE, while AHLT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by American Beacon. BSR is passively managed, while AHLT is actively managed. Over the past year, BSR returned 7.86% vs 37.31% for AHLT. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BSR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for AHLT.

Performance

BSR vs. AHLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSR achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than AHLT's 10.23% return.

BSR

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: -1.03%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 1Y: 7.86%
• 3Y*: 5.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.14%

AHLT

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 1.33%
• 6M: 2.37%
• YTD: 10.23%
• 1Y: 37.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF	$1.71M	$924.06K	$2.01M
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	$62.80K	$47.57K	$82.93K

BSR vs. AHLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.28%	4.21%	12.44%	0.56%
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF	10.23%	13.73%	6.08%	-8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BSR and AHLT is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.36

The correlation between BSR and AHLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BSR vs. AHLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSR

BSR Risk / Return Rank: 31
BSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BSR Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BSR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

AHLT

AHLT Risk / Return Rank: 88
AHLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AHLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AHLT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AHLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AHLT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSR vs. AHLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSR	AHLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	2.10	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	2.70	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.38	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	5.40	-4.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.78	12.73	-9.95

BSR vs. AHLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the AHLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSR and AHLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSR vs. AHLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSR drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum AHLT drawdown of -20.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSR and AHLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSR	AHLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.68%	-20.18%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-6.63%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.45%	-2.74%	-2.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.60%	-9.05%	+4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.81%	-0.25%

Volatility

BSR vs. AHLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) is 2.97%, while American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that BSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSR	AHLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	3.43%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.64%	11.23%	-4.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.08%	17.07%	-7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	17.22%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.99%	17.22%	-1.23%

BSR vs. AHLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AHLT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSR vs. AHLT - Dividend Comparison

BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than AHLT's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF	1.54%	1.70%	0.00%	3.72%
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.83%	2.89%	0.89%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSR and AHLT in my portfolio?

BSR and AHLT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSR or AHLT?

AHLT has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to BSR (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSR dropped -15.68% vs AHLT's -20.18%.

Which ETF is better, BSR or AHLT?

On 1-year performance, AHLT leads with 37.31% vs 7.86% for BSR. On fees, AHLT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BSR has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSR or AHLT?

Over the 1-year period, AHLT has performed better with a 37.31% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSR or AHLT?

AHLT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BSR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSR or AHLT?

BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.54% for AHLT.

What is the main difference between BSR and AHLT?

BSR is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while AHLT is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BSR and 0.95% for AHLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.