BSR vs. BTR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BSR (Beacon Selective Risk ETF) and BTR (Beacon Tactical Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSR is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the NONE, while BTR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Beacon. BSR is passively managed, while BTR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSR returned 7.12%/yr vs 4.33%/yr for BTR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.10% expense ratio.

Performance

BSR vs. BTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSR achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than BTR's 8.22% return.

BSR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 11.37%
• 3Y*: 7.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTR

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 8.22%
• 6M: 7.61%
• 1Y: 18.94%
• 3Y*: 4.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSR vs. BTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.87%	4.21%	12.44%	4.67%
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	8.22%	-2.15%	14.45%	-6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BSR and BTR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	0.88

The correlation between BSR and BTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSR vs. BTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSR	BTR
Utilities	12.1%	8.4%
Technology	12.1%	12.7%
Energy	11.9%	10.4%
Healthcare	11.3%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	11.0%	7.8%
Industrials	10.9%	9.2%
Real Estate	10.7%	8.2%
Basic Materials	10.3%	8.4%
Communication Services	8.4%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	9.5%
Financial Services	0.1%	7.2%

Return for Risk

BSR vs. BTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSR

BSR Risk / Return Rank: 36
BSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BSR Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BSR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BTR

BTR Risk / Return Rank: 61
BTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BTR Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BTR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSR vs. BTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSR	BTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.91	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.67	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.34	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	3.05	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	11.73	-6.73

BSR vs. BTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSR Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the BTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSR and BTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSR vs. BTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSR drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum BTR drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSR and BTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSR	BTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.68%	-16.67%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-6.23%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.68%	-16.67%	+0.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-1.10%	-3.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-5.51%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	1.62%	+0.66%

Volatility

BSR vs. BTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) is 2.41%, while Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that BSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSR	BTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	2.91%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	7.35%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.81%	9.99%	-1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	10.92%	+5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.18%	10.92%	+5.26%

BSR vs. BTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSR and BTR have an expense ratio of 1.10%.

Dividends

BSR vs. BTR - Dividend Comparison

BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than BTR's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.81%	2.89%	0.89%	1.08%
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	1.19%	1.29%	0.87%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSR and BTR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, BSR and BTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BSR or BTR?

BTR has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to BSR (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSR dropped -15.68% vs BTR's -16.67%.

Which ETF is better, BSR or BTR?

On 3-year performance, BSR leads with 7.12% vs 4.33% for BTR. Both ETFs have the same 1.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSR has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSR or BTR?

Over the 3-year period, BSR has performed better with a 7.12% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSR or BTR?

BSR and BTR have the same expense ratio: 1.10% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSR or BTR?

BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.19% for BTR.

What is the main difference between BSR and BTR?

BSR is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while BTR is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.