BSR vs. MGNR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BSR (Beacon Selective Risk ETF) and MGNR (American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSR is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the NONE, while MGNR is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by American Beacon. BSR is passively managed, while MGNR is actively managed. Over the past year, BSR returned 11.37% vs 58.46% for MGNR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MGNR.

Performance

BSR vs. MGNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSR achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than MGNR's 16.39% return.

BSR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 11.37%
• 3Y*: 7.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MGNR

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -3.87%
• YTD: 16.39%
• 6M: 15.53%
• 1Y: 58.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSR vs. MGNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.87%	4.21%	12.77%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	16.39%	50.57%	22.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BSR and MGNR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2024	0.61

The correlation between BSR and MGNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BSR vs. MGNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSR

BSR Risk / Return Rank: 36
BSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BSR Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BSR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

MGNR

MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 77
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSR vs. MGNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSR	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.42	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.91	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.41	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	4.75	-2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	16.69	-11.68

BSR vs. MGNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSR Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the MGNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSR and MGNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSR vs. MGNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSR drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum MGNR drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSR and MGNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSR	MGNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.68%	-22.06%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-12.38%	+6.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-9.17%	+4.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-3.94%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	3.51%	-1.23%

Volatility

BSR vs. MGNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) is 2.41%, while American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that BSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSR	MGNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	8.93%	-6.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	19.05%	-12.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.81%	24.33%	-15.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	25.27%	-9.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.18%	25.27%	-9.09%

BSR vs. MGNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MGNR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSR vs. MGNR - Dividend Comparison

BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than MGNR's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.81%	2.89%	0.89%	1.08%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	1.16%	1.17%	0.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSR and MGNR in my portfolio?

BSR and MGNR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSR or MGNR?

MGNR has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to BSR (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSR dropped -15.68% vs MGNR's -22.06%.

Which ETF is better, BSR or MGNR?

On 1-year performance, MGNR leads with 58.46% vs 11.37% for BSR. On fees, MGNR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BSR has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSR or MGNR?

Over the 1-year period, MGNR has performed better with a 58.46% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSR or MGNR?

MGNR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BSR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSR or MGNR?

BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.16% for MGNR.

What is the main difference between BSR and MGNR?

BSR is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while MGNR is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BSR and 0.75% for MGNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.