THMR vs. TBFG

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

THMR (THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THMR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.

Performance

THMR vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

THMR

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -3.72%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TBFG

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -2.36%
• 6M: 5.28%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 1Y: 17.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THMR vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
THMR THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF	-0.16%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between THMR and TBFG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026	0.88

Return for Risk

THMR vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THMR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 66
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THMR vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THMR	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.26	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.24	—

Drawdowns

THMR vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THMR drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMR and TBFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	THMR	TBFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-13.43%	+5.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.58%	-2.56%	-5.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-1.62%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	THMR	TBFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	10.68%	+4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	11.12%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	11.12%	+3.73%

THMR vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

THMR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

THMR vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

THMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.43%	2.65%	2.43%
THMR THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THMR and TBFG in my portfolio?

THMR and TBFG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, THMR or TBFG?

On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, THMR or TBFG?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for THMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THMR or TBFG?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 0.00% for THMR.

What is the main difference between THMR and TBFG?

They also come from different issuers: THOR Financial Technologies and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for THMR and 0.42% for TBFG.