PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THMR vs. RHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THMR vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


THMR

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.94%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RHRX

1D
0.04%
1M
-3.06%
6M
17.38%
YTD
18.35%
1Y
30.99%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THMR vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between THMR and RHRX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THMR vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THMR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RHRX
RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THMR vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF (THMR) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THMRRHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.77

THMR vs. RHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THMR vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THMR drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMR and RHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THMRRHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-25.33%

+17.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-3.06%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-8.80%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

Volatility

THMR vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THMRRHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

14.21%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

19.03%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

19.03%

-4.12%

THMR vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THMR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

THMR vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison

Neither THMR nor RHRX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


THMR and RHRX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, THMR is cheaper at 1.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

THMR is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.

THMR and RHRX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: THOR Financial Technologies and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for THMR and 1.36% for RHRX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THMR and RHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer