THLV vs. EQWL
THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) and EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THLV is a Equal Weight fund tracking the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, THLV returned 9.68%/yr vs 17.75%/yr for EQWL. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. THLV charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EQWL.
Performance
THLV vs. EQWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than EQWL's 11.12% return.
THLV
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 14.95%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.21%
EQWL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.49M | $9.52M | $9.92M | |
| $336.07K | $335.31K | $358.63K |
THLV vs. EQWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 8.51% | 10.50% | 9.52% | 5.88% | 1.22% |
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 11.12% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between THLV and EQWL is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between THLV and EQWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
THLV vs. EQWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
THLV
EQWL
Energy
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
THLV
EQWL
Technology
THLV
EQWL
Consumer Cyclical
THLV
EQWL
Real Estate
THLV
EQWL
Utilities
THLV
EQWL
Financial Services
THLV
EQWL
Industrials
THLV
EQWL
Consumer Defensive
THLV
EQWL
Healthcare
THLV
EQWL
Basic Materials
THLV
EQWL
Communication Services
THLV
EQWL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THLV vs. EQWL — Risk / Return Rank
THLV
EQWL
THLV vs. EQWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THLV | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.67 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 11.35 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THLV vs. EQWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum EQWL drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and EQWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THLV | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.15% | -49.36% | +36.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | -7.76% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.15% | -14.95% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -0.90% | -2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -6.65% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.82% | +0.42% |
Volatility
THLV vs. EQWL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 2.84%, while Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THLV | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 3.02% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 8.30% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 10.74% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.74% | 15.01% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.74% | 16.71% | -4.97% |
THLV vs. EQWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than EQWL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
THLV vs. EQWL - Dividend Comparison
THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than EQWL's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.57% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.63% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THLV and EQWL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQWL has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to THLV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs EQWL's -49.36%.
On 3-year performance, EQWL leads with 17.75% vs 9.68% for THLV. On fees, EQWL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EQWL has performed better with a 17.75% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQWL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.
THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.57% for EQWL.
THLV is categorized as Equal Weight, while EQWL is Large Cap Blend Equities. THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: THOR and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.25% for EQWL.
EQWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THLV and EQWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer