PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQWL vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQWL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQWL having a 14.45% annualized return and SPY not far ahead at 15.07%.


EQWL

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.29%
6M
8.68%
YTD
11.12%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.45%
ALL TIME*
10.73%

SPY

1D
0.72%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.07%
ALL TIME*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.49M$9.52M$9.92M
$37.27B$35.99B$39.23B

EQWL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQWL
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
11.12%17.61%19.11%19.48%-11.46%28.29%13.94%29.54%-6.30%24.41%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EQWL and SPY is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2006

0.86

The correlation between EQWL and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQWL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQWL
SPY

Technology

21.3%
36.9%

Financial Services

15.3%
12.5%

Healthcare

15.2%
9.4%

Industrials

14.9%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
4.8%

Communication Services

7.4%
9.7%

Utilities

3.0%
2.6%

Energy

2.6%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.9%

Technology

EQWL
21.3%
SPY
36.9%

Financial Services

EQWL
15.3%
SPY
12.5%

Healthcare

EQWL
15.2%
SPY
9.4%

Industrials

EQWL
14.9%
SPY
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EQWL
9.0%
SPY
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

EQWL
8.5%
SPY
4.8%

Communication Services

EQWL
7.4%
SPY
9.7%

Utilities

EQWL
3.0%
SPY
2.6%

Energy

EQWL
2.6%
SPY
3.4%

Real Estate

EQWL
1.9%
SPY
2.0%

Basic Materials

EQWL
1.0%
SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQWL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EQWL
EQWL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EQWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQWL Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EQWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQWL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EQWL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQWLSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.20

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

9.40

+1.95

EQWL vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQWL Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQWL and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQWL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQWLSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.36%

-55.19%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-8.88%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-18.76%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

-24.50%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.30%

-33.72%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-1.40%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-9.01%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.08%

-0.26%

Volatility

EQWL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 3.02%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQWLSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.58%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

10.14%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

12.89%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

17.18%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

17.95%

-1.24%

EQWL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQWL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQWL
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
1.57%1.67%1.86%1.97%2.12%1.65%2.01%2.04%2.23%1.27%2.01%2.03%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQWL and SPY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to EQWL (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQWL dropped -49.36% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 14.45% for EQWL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 14.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQWL.

EQWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

EQWL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQWL and 0.09% for SPY.

EQWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQWL and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer