EQWL vs. SPY
EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQWL returned 14.45%/yr vs 15.07%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EQWL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
EQWL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQWL having a 14.45% annualized return and SPY not far ahead at 15.07%.
EQWL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.73%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.49M | $9.52M | $9.92M | |
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B |
EQWL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 11.12% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -11.46% | 28.29% | 13.94% | 29.54% | -6.30% | 24.41% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQWL and SPY is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2006 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EQWL and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQWL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQWL
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
EQWL
SPY
Financial Services
EQWL
SPY
Healthcare
EQWL
SPY
Industrials
EQWL
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
EQWL
SPY
Consumer Defensive
EQWL
SPY
Communication Services
EQWL
SPY
Utilities
EQWL
SPY
Energy
EQWL
SPY
Real Estate
EQWL
SPY
Basic Materials
EQWL
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQWL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
EQWL
SPY
EQWL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQWL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.20 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 9.40 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQWL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQWL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.36% | -55.19% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -8.88% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -18.76% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -24.50% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.30% | -33.72% | -0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -1.40% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -9.01% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.08% | -0.26% |
Volatility
EQWL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 3.02%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQWL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 3.58% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 10.14% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 12.89% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 17.18% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 17.95% | -1.24% |
EQWL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQWL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.57% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQWL and SPY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to EQWL (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQWL dropped -49.36% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 14.45% for EQWL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 14.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQWL.
EQWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
EQWL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQWL and 0.09% for SPY.
EQWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQWL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer