EQWL vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
EQWL and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 100 Equal Weighted. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both EQWL and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQWL or SCHD.
Key characteristics
| EQWL | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.70% | 17.07% |
| 1Y Return | 35.90% | 29.98% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.48% | 6.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.60% | 12.79% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.98% | 11.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.42 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.74 | 3.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.65 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.07 | 2.92 |
| Martin Ratio | 23.39 | 14.57 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.53% | 2.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.48% | 11.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.36% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.79% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQWL and SCHD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EQWL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EQWL has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 12.98%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQWL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQWL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQWL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than SCHD's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.78% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 1.61% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.38% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
EQWL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQWL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.51% and 3.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.