EQWL vs. QQQ
EQWL (Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQWL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQWL returned 14.89%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQWL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
EQWL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EQWL has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.89%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
EQWL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 22.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
EQWL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 9.55% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -11.46% | 28.29% | 13.94% | 29.54% | -6.30% | 24.41% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQWL and QQQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2006 | 0.73 |
The correlation between EQWL and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQWL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQWL
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
EQWL
QQQ
Financial Services
EQWL
QQQ
Healthcare
EQWL
QQQ
Industrials
EQWL
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
EQWL
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
EQWL
QQQ
Communication Services
EQWL
QQQ
Energy
EQWL
QQQ
Utilities
EQWL
QQQ
Real Estate
EQWL
QQQ
Basic Materials
EQWL
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQWL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EQWL
QQQ
EQWL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQWL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.44 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 12.79 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQWL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQWL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.36% | -82.97% | +33.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -11.96% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -22.77% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | -35.12% | +12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.30% | -35.12% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.99% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -32.73% | +26.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 3.21% | -1.36% |
Volatility
EQWL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 3.80%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQWL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 8.47% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 14.20% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 17.67% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 22.64% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 22.43% | -5.61% |
EQWL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQWL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.93% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQWL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to EQWL (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQWL dropped -49.36% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 14.89% for EQWL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EQWL has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 14.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQWL.
EQWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.
EQWL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EQWL tracks S&P 100 Equal Weight Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQWL and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQWL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer