EQWL vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
EQWL and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 100 Equal Weighted. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both EQWL and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQWL or QQQ.
Key characteristics
| EQWL | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.97% | 25.63% |
| 1Y Return | 33.44% | 33.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.54% | 9.83% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.51% | 21.21% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.00% | 18.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.45 | 2.12 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.78 | 2.79 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.65 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.78 | 2.71 |
| Martin Ratio | 23.65 | 9.88 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.53% | 3.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.48% | 17.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.36% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.57% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQWL and QQQ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EQWL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a 22.97% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 25.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EQWL has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.00%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.37% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQWL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQWL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQWL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than QQQ's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.78% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 1.61% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.59% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
EQWL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQWL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 3.49%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.