TH vs. CL
TH (Target Hospitality Corp.) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. TH operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, TH returned 35.55%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for CL. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TH vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TH achieves a 97.13% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 15.81% return.
TH
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- -14.51%
- 6M
- 124.29%
- YTD
- 97.13%
- 1Y
- 112.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.97%
- 5Y*
- 35.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.90%
CL
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $438.91M | $420.67M | $461.04M | |
| $15.48M | $16.08M | $24.19M |
TH vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TH Target Hospitality Corp. | 97.13% | -17.12% | -0.67% | -35.73% | 325.28% | 125.32% | -68.40% | -50.40% | 3.38% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 15.81% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TH and CL is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.01 |
The correlation between TH and CL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TH:
$1.57B
CL:
$71.92B
TH:
-$0.44
CL:
$2.53
TH:
4.87
CL:
3.44
TH:
4.19
CL:
306.89
TH:
$323.52M
CL:
$21.05B
TH:
$34.44M
CL:
$12.72B
TH:
$17.91M
CL:
$3.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TH vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
TH
CL
TH vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TH | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.09 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 0.61 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 1.22 | +6.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TH vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TH drawdown since its inception was -92.35%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TH and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TH | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.35% | -58.91% | -33.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.95% | -16.97% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.13% | -29.05% | -40.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.94% | -29.05% | -42.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.05% | -13.40% | -9.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.61% | -11.24% | -30.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.03% | 8.49% | +5.54% |
Volatility
TH vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) has a higher volatility of 15.32% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 7.26%. This indicates that TH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TH | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.32% | 7.26% | +8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.01% | 16.91% | +33.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.22% | 22.50% | +40.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.69% | 18.99% | +47.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.29% | 19.88% | +55.41% |
Dividends
TH vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
TH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
TH Target Hospitality Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TH vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Target Hospitality Corp. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TH vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
TH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Target Hospitality Corp. reported a gross profit of 6.88M and revenue of 72.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.5%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.30B and revenue of 5.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.
TH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Target Hospitality Corp. reported an operating income of -7.67M and revenue of 72.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.5%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.02B and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
TH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Target Hospitality Corp. reported a net income of -12.92M and revenue of 72.78M, resulting in a net margin of -17.8%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 693.00M and revenue of 5.36B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TH and CL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TH has higher volatility (15.32%) compared to CL (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TH dropped -92.35% vs CL's -58.91%.
TH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TH and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer