TH vs. CL
TH (Target Hospitality Corp.) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. TH operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, TH returned 34.71%/yr vs 4.47%/yr for CL. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TH vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TH achieves a 151.44% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 13.60% return.
TH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 12.51%
- YTD
- 151.44%
- 6M
- 145.01%
- 1Y
- 184.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- 34.71%
- 10Y*
- —
CL
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
TH vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TH Target Hospitality Corp. | 151.44% | -17.12% | -0.67% | -35.73% | 325.28% | 125.32% | -68.40% | -50.40% | 3.38% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 13.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TH and CL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
TH:
$2.01B
CL:
$71.39B
TH:
-$0.44
CL:
$2.58
TH:
6.21
CL:
3.45
TH:
5.34
CL:
492.33
TH:
$323.52M
CL:
$20.80B
TH:
$34.44M
CL:
$12.49B
TH:
$17.91M
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TH vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
TH
CL
TH vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TH | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.04 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.81 | 0.19 | +5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.39 | 0.31 | +14.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TH vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TH drawdown since its inception was -92.35%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TH and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TH | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.35% | -58.91% | -33.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.95% | -18.64% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.13% | -29.05% | -40.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.94% | -29.05% | -42.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -15.05% | +14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.98% | -11.24% | -30.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.87% | 11.37% | +1.50% |
Volatility
TH vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) has a higher volatility of 12.69% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 8.18%. This indicates that TH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TH | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.69% | 8.18% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.01% | 17.25% | +30.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.49% | 21.63% | +39.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.36% | 18.81% | +48.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.58% | 19.77% | +55.81% |
Dividends
TH vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
TH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.36% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
TH Target Hospitality Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TH vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Target Hospitality Corp. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TH vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
TH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Hospitality Corp. reported a gross profit of 6.88M and revenue of 72.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.5%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
TH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Hospitality Corp. reported an operating income of -7.67M and revenue of 72.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.5%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
TH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Hospitality Corp. reported a net income of -12.92M and revenue of 72.78M, resulting in a net margin of -17.8%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TH and CL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TH has higher volatility (12.69%) compared to CL (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TH dropped -92.35% vs CL's -58.91%.
TH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TH and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer