TGRT vs. PBUS
TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TGRT is actively managed, while PBUS is passively managed. Over the past year, TGRT returned 20.65% vs 28.14% for PBUS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
TGRT vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than PBUS's 11.31% return.
TGRT
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 28.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- —
TGRT vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 5.36% | 16.94% | 32.85% | 12.79% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 11.31% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRT and PBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TGRT and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
TGRT vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGRT
PBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
TGRT
PBUS
Communication Services
TGRT
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
TGRT
PBUS
Healthcare
TGRT
PBUS
Financial Services
TGRT
PBUS
Industrials
TGRT
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
TGRT
PBUS
Utilities
TGRT
PBUS
Basic Materials
TGRT
PBUS
Energy
TGRT
PBUS
Real Estate
TGRT
-
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRT vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
TGRT
PBUS
TGRT vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGRT | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 3.13 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 14.18 | -10.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGRT | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.34 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.80 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
TGRT vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRT | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -33.15% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -9.02% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -0.21% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -5.13% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 1.99% | +3.45% |
Volatility
TGRT vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that TGRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRT | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 2.88% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 9.13% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 12.06% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 17.05% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 19.33% | -0.25% |
TGRT vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRT vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TGRT and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TGRT has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to PBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRT dropped -22.04% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 1-year performance, PBUS leads with 28.14% vs 20.65% for TGRT. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 28.14% return vs 20.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TGRT.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.07% for TGRT.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.04% for PBUS.
PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRT and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer