TGRT vs. TGRW
TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TGRT returned 21.59% vs 21.56% for TGRW. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.
Performance
TGRT vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than TGRW's 5.83% return.
TGRT
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGRW
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
TGRT vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 5.49% | 16.94% | 32.85% | 12.79% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 5.83% | 15.62% | 29.94% | 11.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRT and TGRW is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between TGRT and TGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
TGRT vs. TGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGRT
TGRW
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
TGRT
TGRW
Communication Services
TGRT
TGRW
Consumer Cyclical
TGRT
TGRW
Healthcare
TGRT
TGRW
Financial Services
TGRT
TGRW
Industrials
TGRT
TGRW
Consumer Defensive
TGRT
TGRW
Utilities
TGRT
TGRW
-
Basic Materials
TGRT
TGRW
Energy
TGRT
TGRW
-
Real Estate
TGRT
-
TGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRT vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank
TGRT
TGRW
TGRT vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGRT | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.84 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 3.64 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGRT | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.53 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
TGRT vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and TGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRT | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -43.33% | +21.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -18.84% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -1.79% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -12.48% | +9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 5.94% | -0.50% |
Volatility
TGRT vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) is 3.66%, while T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that TGRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRT | TGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.91% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 12.54% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 16.57% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 23.27% | -4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 23.02% | -3.93% |
TGRT vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRT vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison
TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, TGRT and TGRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TGRW has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to TGRT (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRT dropped -22.04% vs TGRW's -43.33%.
On 1-year performance, TGRT leads with 21.59% vs 21.56% for TGRW. On fees, TGRT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TGRT has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TGRT has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 21.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGRT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
TGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.
Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.52% for TGRW.
TGRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRT and TGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer