TGRT vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TGRT (T. Rowe Price Growth ETF) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. TGRT is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. Over the past year, TGRT returned 21.59% vs 35.66% for QGRW. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TGRT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

TGRT vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.

TGRT

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 6M: 5.18%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 9.03%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 35.66%
• 3Y*: 29.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRT vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF	5.49%	16.94%	32.85%	12.79%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	15.43%	19.20%	34.85%	11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRT and QGRW is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023	0.97

The correlation between TGRT and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

TGRT vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TGRT	QGRW
Technology	54.2%	52.1%
Communication Services	14.0%	17.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	12.4%
Healthcare	8.0%	4.3%
Financial Services	5.3%	4.1%
Industrials	4.6%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	0.5%
Utilities	0.5%	0.4%
Basic Materials	0.4%	-
Energy	0.2%	0.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

TGRT vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRT

TGRT Risk / Return Rank: 32
TGRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TGRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TGRT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TGRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TGRT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 54
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRT vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TGRT	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.06	-0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.75	-0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	2.32	-1.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.98	9.08	-5.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGRT vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRT and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TGRT	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	2.06	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	1.66	-0.44

Drawdowns

TGRT vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRT drawdown since its inception was -22.04%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRT and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGRT	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-24.40%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.89%	-15.44%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-1.33%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-3.26%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.44%	3.94%	+1.50%

Volatility

TGRT vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) is 3.66%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that TGRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGRT	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	4.71%	-1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.51%	13.67%	-1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.10%	17.40%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	21.08%	-1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	21.08%	-1.99%

TGRT vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGRT vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, which matches QGRW's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.07%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%
TGRT T. Rowe Price Growth ETF	0.07%	0.08%	0.09%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGRT and QGRW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, TGRT and QGRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TGRT or QGRW?

QGRW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to TGRT (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRT dropped -22.04% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, TGRT or QGRW?

On 1-year performance, QGRW leads with 35.66% vs 21.59% for TGRT. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, TGRT has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TGRT or QGRW?

Over the 1-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 35.66% return vs 21.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TGRT or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TGRT or QGRW?

TGRT and QGRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.07%.

What is the main difference between TGRT and QGRW?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TGRT and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.