PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLR vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return.


TGLR

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.59%
YTD
13.10%
6M
12.32%
1Y
34.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TGLR
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
13.10%23.30%18.71%4.07%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and SCHG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2023

0.74

The correlation between TGLR and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

TGLR vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGLR
SCHG

Technology

24.6%
46.3%

Financial Services

15.2%
6.7%

Industrials

15.0%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
12.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
7.7%

Energy

7.6%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
16.0%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.4%

Utilities

2.1%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.5%

Technology

TGLR
24.6%
SCHG
46.3%

Financial Services

TGLR
15.2%
SCHG
6.7%

Industrials

TGLR
15.0%
SCHG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TGLR
13.1%
SCHG
12.7%

Healthcare

TGLR
8.8%
SCHG
7.7%

Energy

TGLR
7.6%
SCHG
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

TGLR
4.7%
SCHG
1.7%

Communication Services

TGLR
3.7%
SCHG
16.0%

Basic Materials

TGLR
3.0%
SCHG
1.4%

Utilities

TGLR
2.1%
SCHG
0.4%

Real Estate

TGLR
2.1%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLR
TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGLRSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

1.60

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.82

2.18

+1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.28

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

1.51

+2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.07

5.04

+12.03

TGLR vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLR and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGLRSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

1.60

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.84

+0.56

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLRSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-34.59%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-16.41%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.78%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-5.20%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

4.90%

-2.90%

Volatility

TGLR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLRSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.61%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

11.62%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

15.50%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

22.27%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

21.55%

-6.26%

TGLR vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGLR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
TGLR
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
0.88%1.16%1.02%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGLR and SCHG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGLR has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 1-year performance, TGLR leads with 34.03% vs 24.64% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TGLR has performed better with a 34.03% return vs 24.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.

TGLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

TGLR is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: LAFFER TENGLER and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.04% for SCHG.

TGLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLR and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer