PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLR vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return.


TGLR

1D
0.58%
1M
0.20%
6M
7.41%
YTD
11.90%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.92%

SCHG

1D
1.12%
1M
0.15%
6M
7.02%
YTD
4.99%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
18.27%
ALL TIME*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$247.66M$249.87M$339.91M
$132.64K$128.19K$226.12K

TGLR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TGLR
Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF
11.90%23.30%18.71%4.88%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.99%17.50%34.95%9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and SCHG is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023

0.73

The correlation between TGLR and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

TGLR vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGLR
SCHG

Technology

24.6%
44.0%

Financial Services

15.2%
7.7%

Industrials

15.0%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
11.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.9%

Energy

7.6%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
14.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.6%

Utilities

2.1%
0.5%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.6%

Technology

TGLR
24.6%
SCHG
44.0%

Financial Services

TGLR
15.2%
SCHG
7.7%

Industrials

TGLR
15.0%
SCHG
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TGLR
13.1%
SCHG
11.2%

Healthcare

TGLR
8.8%
SCHG
9.9%

Energy

TGLR
7.6%
SCHG
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

TGLR
4.7%
SCHG
1.9%

Communication Services

TGLR
3.7%
SCHG
14.1%

Basic Materials

TGLR
3.0%
SCHG
1.6%

Utilities

TGLR
2.1%
SCHG
0.5%

Real Estate

TGLR
2.1%
SCHG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGLR
TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGLR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGLRSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

0.83

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

2.62

+8.03

TGLR vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLR and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLRSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-34.59%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-16.41%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-3.10%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-5.19%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

5.19%

-3.03%

Volatility

TGLR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is 3.54%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that TGLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLRSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.32%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

12.90%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

16.67%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

22.42%

-7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

21.59%

-6.42%

TGLR vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGLR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
TGLR
Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF
0.94%1.16%1.02%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGLR and SCHG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to TGLR (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 1-year performance, TGLR leads with 24.11% vs 16.16% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TGLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TGLR has performed better with a 24.11% return vs 16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.

TGLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

TGLR is categorized as Dividend, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.04% for SCHG.

TGLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLR and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer