PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLR vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TGLR vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TGLR vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TGLR
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
0.36%23.30%5.17%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
-5.75%20.16%11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -5.75% return.


TGLR

1D
2.54%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
0.36%
6M
2.57%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
3.02%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-5.75%
6M
-3.27%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TGLR vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TGLR vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLR
TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLR vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGLRQDVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.12

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

1.77

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.07

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.52

7.80

+2.72

TGLR vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLR and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGLRQDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.12

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.89

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and QDVO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TGLR vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than QDVO's 11.26% yield.


TTM202520242023
TGLR
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
1.12%1.16%1.02%0.65%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
11.26%9.92%2.79%0.00%

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and QDVO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLRQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-17.75%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.59%

-10.24%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-7.50%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-2.50%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.71%

-0.02%

Volatility

TGLR vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF (TGLR) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TGLRQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

5.31%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

9.74%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.36%

18.60%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

18.02%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

18.02%

-2.63%