TGLR vs. CCEF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TGLR (Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF) and CCEF (Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF) are both Dividend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TGLR returned 25.36% vs 13.67% for CCEF. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TGLR charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for CCEF.

Performance

TGLR vs. CCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than CCEF's 7.28% return.

TGLR

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 7.68%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 1Y: 25.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.26%

CCEF

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	$84.87K	$111.22K	$103.52K
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF	$127.00K	$118.29K	$218.46K

TGLR vs. CCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF	13.03%	23.30%	19.56%
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	7.28%	13.47%	17.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and CCEF is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024	0.74

The correlation between TGLR and CCEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TGLR vs. CCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGLR

TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 80
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CCEF

CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 62
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGLR vs. CCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TGLR	CCEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.63	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.28	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.30	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	1.77	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.79	7.56	+4.23

TGLR vs. CCEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the CCEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLR and CCEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. CCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than CCEF's maximum drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and CCEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGLR	CCEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.82%	-13.25%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-7.75%	-0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-0.15%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.33%	-1.32%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.81%	+0.35%

Volatility

TGLR vs. CCEF - Volatility Comparison

Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) at 2.18%. This indicates that TGLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGLR	CCEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	2.18%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	7.18%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	8.43%	+4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	10.66%	+4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	10.66%	+4.51%

TGLR vs. CCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CCEF's 2.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGLR vs. CCEF - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than CCEF's 8.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	8.02%	8.08%	6.55%	0.00%
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF	0.93%	1.16%	1.02%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGLR and CCEF in my portfolio?

TGLR and CCEF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TGLR or CCEF?

TGLR has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to CCEF (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs CCEF's -13.25%.

Which ETF is better, TGLR or CCEF?

On 1-year performance, TGLR leads with 25.36% vs 13.67% for CCEF. On fees, TGLR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TGLR or CCEF?

Over the 1-year period, TGLR has performed better with a 25.36% return vs 13.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TGLR or CCEF?

TGLR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TGLR or CCEF?

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 8.02%, compared with 0.93% for TGLR.

What is the main difference between TGLR and CCEF?

They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 2.74% for CCEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.