TGB vs. PYLD
TGB (Taseko Mines Limited) is a stock, while PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past year, TGB returned 225.52% vs 7.40% for PYLD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGB vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 37.46% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.95% return.
TGB
- 1D
- -6.27%
- 1M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 37.46%
- 6M
- 48.19%
- 1Y
- 225.52%
- 3Y*
- 77.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.10%
- 10Y*
- 31.34%
PYLD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TGB vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 37.46% | 191.75% | 38.57% | -0.00% |
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.95% | 9.57% | 7.69% | 5.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGB and PYLD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGB vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TGB
PYLD
TGB vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGB | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.48 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.40 | 2.29 | +4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.62 | 10.44 | +7.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGB | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.49 | 2.42 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 2.04 | -2.06 |
Drawdowns
TGB vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and PYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGB | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -4.52% | -94.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.47% | -3.25% | -32.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.42% | -0.44% | -42.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.39% | -0.65% | -80.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.86% | 0.71% | +12.15% |
Volatility
TGB vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison
Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 22.25% compared to PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.24%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGB | PYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.25% | 1.24% | +21.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.10% | 2.50% | +46.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.04% | 3.08% | +61.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.53% | 3.99% | +58.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.65% | 3.99% | +61.66% |
Dividends
TGB vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison
TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 6.30% | 6.21% | 6.40% | 2.72% |
TGB Taseko Mines Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGB and PYLD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGB has higher volatility (22.25%) compared to PYLD (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs PYLD's -4.52%.
TGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGB and PYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer