PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PYLD vs. CGMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PYLD and CGMS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

PYLD vs. CGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.70%
2.52%
PYLD
CGMS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PYLD:

2.32

CGMS:

1.59

Sortino Ratio

PYLD:

3.35

CGMS:

2.30

Omega Ratio

PYLD:

1.45

CGMS:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

PYLD:

3.93

CGMS:

3.75

Martin Ratio

PYLD:

10.65

CGMS:

10.19

Ulcer Index

PYLD:

0.77%

CGMS:

0.71%

Daily Std Dev

PYLD:

3.51%

CGMS:

4.54%

Max Drawdown

PYLD:

-4.52%

CGMS:

-3.79%

Current Drawdown

PYLD:

-0.11%

CGMS:

-0.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than CGMS's 0.51% return.


PYLD

YTD

0.96%

1M

0.96%

6M

2.71%

1Y

7.60%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CGMS

YTD

0.51%

1M

0.51%

6M

2.52%

1Y

6.51%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PYLD vs. CGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMS's 0.39% expense ratio.


PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Expense ratio chart for PYLD: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for CGMS: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PYLD vs. CGMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PYLD is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PYLD is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PYLD is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PYLD is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PYLD is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PYLD is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CGMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGMS is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGMS is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGMS is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGMS is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGMS is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGMS is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PYLD vs. CGMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.321.59
The chart of Sortino ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.352.30
The chart of Omega ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.451.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 3.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.933.75
The chart of Martin ratio for PYLD, currently valued at 10.65, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.6510.19
PYLD
CGMS

The current PYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the CGMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLD and CGMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.32
1.59
PYLD
CGMS

Dividends

PYLD vs. CGMS - Dividend Comparison

PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than CGMS's 5.39% yield.


TTM202420232022
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.49%5.97%2.72%0.00%
CGMS
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
5.39%5.91%5.84%0.97%

Drawdowns

PYLD vs. CGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, which is greater than CGMS's maximum drawdown of -3.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and CGMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.11%
-0.51%
PYLD
CGMS

Volatility

PYLD vs. CGMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) is 0.96%, while Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that PYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.96%
1.36%
PYLD
CGMS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab