PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFITX vs. TLHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFITX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than TLHIX's 7.64% return.


TFITX

1D
1.29%
1M
1.90%
YTD
12.03%
6M
11.83%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*

TLHIX

1D
0.84%
1M
1.40%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.60%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TFITX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund
12.03%21.24%15.76%21.16%-17.62%18.06%10.38%
TLHIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund
7.64%15.76%10.59%15.54%-15.72%11.65%6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TFITX and TLHIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.98

The correlation between TFITX and TLHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFITX vs. TLHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFITX
TFITX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TFITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFITX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TFITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFITX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TLHIX
TLHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TLHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TLHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFITXTLHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.03

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

13.02

+0.36

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFITX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the TLHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFITX and TLHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFITX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than TLHIX's maximum drawdown of -23.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFITX and TLHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFITXTLHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-23.86%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-6.15%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-9.46%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-22.15%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.28%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-3.49%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.43%

+0.65%

Volatility

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) at 3.40%. This indicates that TFITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFITXTLHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

3.40%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

6.89%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

8.25%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

10.33%

+4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

11.13%

+3.77%

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFITX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TLHIX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TFITX vs. TLHIX - Dividend Comparison

TFITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than TLHIX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFITX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund
2.18%2.44%2.12%2.05%2.09%1.84%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLHIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund
3.90%4.20%3.62%2.44%2.82%3.21%2.06%2.25%2.68%0.14%2.49%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, TFITX and TLHIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TFITX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to TLHIX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFITX dropped -25.64% vs TLHIX's -23.86%.

TLHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFITX and TLHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer